[JPackage-discuss] JPackage and Fedora 9 for Jboss

Wed Jul 23 17:14:39 CEST 2008

The xalan-j2 (2.7.0) RPM package contains xalan-j2.jar and 
xalan-j2-serializer.jar. xalan-j2-serializer.jar contains the 
org.apache.xml.serializer package.

http://www.gchii.org/packageaudit/search?option=package&package=1262

Thanks,

At 04:37 PM 7/22/2008, you wrote:
>I'm happy to report that I seem to have a good sync of the repo and
>that once I installed the compat package for sun, which pulled in the
>jdk package that I host internally, tomcat5 and jbossas both installed
>on clean systems.
>
>In the course of writing an installer for Alfresco, which in my case
>is packaged as a war, I discovered that it has two endorsed jars. One
>of them is xalan, which appears to be xalan-j2 (2.7.0) and is easily
>placed into the endorsed dir by a
>rebuild-jar-repository
>
>However, the other is "serializer.jar" whose manifest states the following:
>
>Manifest-Version: 1.0
>Created-By: 1.3.1 (IBM Corporation)
>Main-Class: org.apache.xml.serializer.Version
>Class-Path: xml-apis.jar
>
>Name: org/apache/xml/serializer/
>Comment: Serializer to write out XML, HTML etc. as a stream of charact
>  ers from an input DOM or from input SAX events.
>Specification-Title: XSL Transformations (XSLT), at http://www.w3.org/
>  TR/xslt
>Specification-Vendor: W3C Recommendation 16 November 1999
>Specification-Version: 1.0
>Implementation-Title: org.apache.xml.serializer
>Implementation-Version: 2.7.0
>Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
>Implementation-URL: http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/usagepatterns.html
>
>Name: org/apache/xml/serializer/utils/
>Comment: Utilities used internally by the Serializer. Not for external
>   use.
>Implementation-Title: org.apache.xml.serializer.utils
>Implementation-Version: 2.7.0
>Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
>
>
>The implementations inside this jar don't appear to exist anywhere in
>the JPackage repo that I can find.  Is there another jpackage rpm that
>provides it?  If not, I'd be happy to give it a shot with a little
>coaxing and advice.
>Thanks,
>Mykel
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 15:28, Mykel Alvis <mykel.alvis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've gotten closer
> >
> > I initially had sun jdk 6u3 installed, and the repos puked that back
> > at me saying that I needed 1.5. I don't know how big of an issue that
> > is, but I got around it by removing 1.6 and installing 1.5.0_14 and
> > the sun compat package.
> >
> > Then I got a depsolv issue with geronimo-specs-compat from the fedora
> > repo.  So I excluded g-s-c with the following.
> >
> > yum install jbossas --exclude=geronimo-specs-compat
> >
> > gives me a download error.
> > 
> http://puppet/repositories/jpackage/5.0/generic/free/RPMS/jacorb-2.3.0-6.jpp5.noarch.rpm:
> > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> >
> >
> > Apparently my sync of the repo data for jpackage 5.0 free is wrong and
> > my sync request this morning was connection-rejected.  The metadata
> > tells yum that jacorb-2.3.0-6 is in the repo, but the actual repo has
> > 2.3.0-7 so the package fails to download.  I might've gotten a sync
> > that didn't have the metadata already updated properly, so I'll try
> > again this evening to re-sync the repo, since I can't do it from
> > inside our network.
> >
> > In the interim, I did an update of the "50free" repo,
> >
> > # yum clean all
> > # yum install jbossas --exclude=geronimo-specs-compat
> >
> > provides success and a runnable instance!
> >
> > Since all of my software installation is actually handled by puppet,
> > I'm going to have to denote the exclude in the yum config, but I can
> > definitely live with that.
> >
> > Thanks for the advice!
> >
> > Is there anything that you can think of off the top of your head
> > that's going to explode because I'm excluding  g-s-c ?
> >
> > Mykel
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 15:20, David Walluck <david at zarb.org> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Mykel Alvis wrote:
> >> | Sorry, I think I understand but I'd like to clarify. I am using Fedora
> >> | 9 (for the short term) so does that mean I should prefer the Jpackage
> >> | Fedora-9 over the Jpackage generic  or REDHAT Fedora-9 over the
> >> | Jpackage generic?  It seems likely to be the former.
> >>
> >> I meant the fedora-9 JPackage repo. But I guess you'd prefer the
> >> official fedora main and updates repo over this. It really depends on
> >> who you trust/depend on for your Java packages.
> >>
> >> Note that the jms problem is caused because the geronimo-specs-compat in
> >> Fedora has a file called /usr/share/java/jms.jar. This is marked as
> >> %ghost in geronimo-jms-1.1-api, but not in geronimo-j2ee-1.4-apis. It
> >> hsould also be marked in geronimo-j2ee-1.4-apis, but the fact that it
> >> isn't may allow an install. Really, I think that the
> >> geronimo-specs-compat Fedora package needs to be removed.
> >>
> >> - --
> >> Sincerely,
> >>
> >> David Walluck
> >> <david at zarb.org>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
> >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >>
> >> iEYEARECAAYFAkiCTJAACgkQItObMyg2XCXVHACfcPNIO5fJX9hLClClop7MO/Bz
> >> cgkAnjXdzLroksMeKQk16+o3agZ5EBx/
> >> =AZOy
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> JPackage-discuss mailing list
> >> JPackage-discuss at zarb.org
> >> https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
> >>
> >
>_______________________________________________
>JPackage-discuss mailing list
>JPackage-discuss at zarb.org
>https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss